Search Construction Advisor Today

  • constructionadvisortoday.com

« Steel Projects Develops Interface with Tekla Structures BIM, Winsteel, Winser PLM, Steel Fabrication Machinery | Main | Autodesk Unveils Guide to Sustainable Design for Architecture, Engineering, and Construction »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"Should a party ever be allowed to withhold cost records and proceed using estimates from secondary sources?" Isn't this the standard for liquidated damages, given the secondary source is an estimate prior to actual damage. I think it could work both ways, that a backcharge method could be established and agreed to, similar to LD.

During my last 20+ years when a value for a change is approved prior to the work being performed, the owner has NO right to see and review the job site records in respect of this change, HOWEVER when an extra work order hos not been preapproved the owner has always had the wright to reveiw the contracotrs records in reference to the work order.

My is that one needs to be careful here. Whatever "pre-approval" for a change prior to work being executed would be a very significant and necessary piece of information.

Clearly the key factual component lay in the original contract both parties has equal bargaining power at inception and the CONTRACTOR willingly entered into. His misgiving with "final payment", and the endrun/loophole her is tring to create are misdirected materially baseless...unless the “final payment” contractual provision is 1. Allows it 2.)Ambiguous and thus not bulletproof.

If the actual price was twice that indicated by RSMeans, would the sub accept RSMeans or opt to pay the higher actual cost? Sometimes you win, sometimes you don't.

The fact pattern doesn't provide some critical items: (1) did the owner's check state "paid in full"? (2) did the contractor deliver a final release and waiver of lien in exchange for receiving the check? (3) did the contractor deliver a final affidavit of payment? The answers to these questions might be used to bolster either the owner's or the contractor's argument.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment